Not malice, plain zero integrity.

Christian groups expressed their anguish at the depiction of the Jesus Christ in their newspaper (holding a beer can and a cigar). Much as it seems to be projected as an act of malice, I simply see the pure disrespect to other’s intellectual property. Simple modus operandi: Doing of a random search for jesus’s images on the internet (with Google of course), using the first best fit image you can get and then using it without accreditation. That is as far as the journalistic integrity of the newspapers go.